Second, their analysis in their example confuses a collective action problem all movements-both violent and non-violent-face with a pacifistic impulse as such. First, they seem to implicitly rely on the false claim that individuals are usually obligated to violently resist authority. There are three problems with Black Cat’s article. Finally, they conclude with a strong argument that pacifism does not acknowledge that “all politics is violence.” Too many anarchists, they claim, have not gotten rid of the “cop in your head” that tells us that we must follow the edicts of authority. They argue this example of reluctance is a sign of this pacifistic pathology that inhibits the effectiveness of anarchist movements. Black Cat tells a story of an anti-police brutality protest in which most of the crowd refused to force their way into a building past cops. ” The author argues that while most anarchists are not explicit pacifists, too many are possessed by a pathology of pacifism that makes us too hesitant to engage in violent forms of resistance. A recent example of this is Black Cat’s “Pacifism and the Pacifistic: a Tale of the Politically Dead. However, sometimes in our efforts to counter-signal against centrists, we let our edginess get the better of us and start embracing ideas that are hostile to the very core of the most appealing and fundamental aspects of anarchism. These two things are not necessarily bad an edgy predisposition enables you more easily see through the lies most people believe, and counter-signaling is necessary to distinguish a marginal movement from the mainstream, to signal to one’s fellow anarchists where one stands, and to reinforce radical critiques of the status quo. Anarchists, like any fringe movement, need to counter-signal against the political mainstream in order to remain relevant. We anarchists are usually very good at being edgy, and edginess is one of the personality traits that probably attracted many of us to anarchism. We’ll be updating our Patreon tiers next month as well, and offering more cool prizes and opportunities for our supporters. We appreciate all you do and look forward to continuing the growth the podcast has seen so far. From there, you can support this podcast and other C4SS projects by making a monthly pledge of $5 or more. In the meantime, head over to the C4SS Patreon and consider supporting this project. CTIVO INCORRECT MEDIA KEY FOR BASEMENT FREEBut we also have to win the ideological battle here, and next week, we’ll get deep into the weeds on the right to free movement and anarchist positions on immigration. From ICE blockades to providing safe houses and advocating for sanctuary cities, there is a lot to be done. With so much talk of immigration issues in the current political cycle, it’s important to think about how we can help and support our neighbors who have moved from somewhere else. Next month, we’ll cover the issue of immigration rights and reform. An important conversation for anyone living in the Internet age! In this episode, we consider issues of due process, the precedents set by the Silk Road case, and the right to privacy. Today’s guest is Lyn Ulbricht. For those unfamiliar with the Silk Road case, Lyn is Ross Ulbricht’s mother and she became a crusader for due process after his 2013 arrest for developing the dark net trading site. You can now subscribe to Mutual Exchange Radio on iTunes, Stitcher, and Spotify.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |